Jakala's questions

I have problems when testing an Abstract type class. Currently I do things like this:

    $coche = new class extends CocheAbstract {
        public function hasRuedas(){}
        public function setColor(MyColor $color){}
        public function getErrors(){}
    };

This is because my AbstractCar class has the hasWheels, setColor and getErrors methods of abstract type. This method of getting an abstract class "object" has worked fine for me so far. But I have found myself in the situation that another abstract class has a built-in constructor:

abstract  class MetodosPagoAbstract 
{
    // aqui unos metodos abstractos
    public function __construct($param1, $param2)
    {
       // codigo del constructor
    } 
}

The method I have used so far does not allow me to send parameters when creating an object of that class to test it. I have tried with:

    $metodosPago = (new class extends metodosPagoAbstract {
         // aqui los metodos abstractos
    }($param1, $param2);

But the test complains because the constructor of the object is not called:

Time: 425 ms, Memory: 6.00 MB

There was 1 error:

1) tests\Coches\Handler\MetodosPagoAbstractTest::testConstructor
ArgumentCountError: Too few arguments to function CochesBundle\Handler\Pagos\MetodosPagosAbstract::__construct(), 0 passed in /tests/CochesBundle/Handler/MetodosPagoAbstractTest.php on line 22 and exactly 2 expected

Has anyone encountered a similar situation? Do you know how this object can be created in order to test it?

I am testing an application with phpunit, and I have found a very rare case. I have an object with a method similar to the following:

public function validar(array $array = [])
{
if(empty($array['clave'])
    throw new \Exception("no hay clave");

    // otras validaciones...

    //fin
}

This method checks the array passed to it as a parameter, and if there is an error, it throws the corresponding exception. If correct, the flow continues its course.

When trying to do the test in the event that all the parameters are correct, I do the following:

public function testValidarHappyCase() 
{
    $objeto = new MiClase();
    $params = [
        'clave' => 1,
        'user' => 3,
        'publicacion' => 3    
    ];
    $objeto->validar();
}

The problem is that when I run the phpunit, I get this:

Testing App\Tests\Clases\MiClaseTest
.R..                                                                4 / 4 (100%)

Time: 21.68 seconds, Memory: 42.50 MB

There was 1 risky test:

1) App\Tests\Clases\MiClasetest::testValidarHappyCase
This test did not perform any assertions

/zen/tests/Clases/MiClaseTest.php:41

OK, but incomplete, skipped, or risky tests!
Tests: 4, Assertions: 5, Risky: 1.

As the method doesn't return any value, I can't do any assert with the result, to validate if it is correct or not. I really don't know how to test this.

It occurred to me that I could add a return 1 or something like that, so that a result would be validated in the test. The problem is that by specification of the app I can't touch those objects...

Does anyone have any idea to check this?

I am making a script to show, for each of the dockers that I have set up on my machine, which contain various applications managed as git clones, the last commit and the author of this one. At the moment I have made a loop that runs through each one of the dockers, with:

for a in $(docker ps -aq); do
   ...
done

now the idea is to run the git command inside this loop:

git log -1 --pretty=format:\"%h-%an\" 

The problem I have is that this command, although it shows only the last line and with the format that I want, it waits for the pagination of the git command, so until I do ctrl^C, it stays waiting in the command , in each of the docker.

I have tried with:

git -c pager.diff=false log -1 --pretty=format:"%h-%an" 

In theory, with turning off pager.diff at run time, it shouldn't wait for said pager (since it's only one line, the last one), but it stays the same (it seems to "ignore" that I add pager.diff)

Currently the command I have (which stops due to the pagination problem) is this:

for contenedor in $(docker ps -aq); do
   $comando="git -c pager.diff=false log -1 --pretty=format:\"%h-%an\"" 

   docker exec -ti $contenedor $comando
done

I had to add the \ in the quotes, because format requires the format string to be in quotes, and because I store the command in a variable, and then execute it with docker exec.

Does anyone come up with something, or maybe there is some other way to achieve this???

I'm making a game in Unity 3d, platform type, with scroll to the right. Now I am with the sound part of the game, and I don't know if there is something similar to the term that I put in the question. I try to explain it (I'm sure it has a name, but I don't know it, I've called it spriteSheet de sonido).

In the case of sprites, we can use a single image that we split with the Unity3d image editor, to be able to use each "piece" of image, as a sequence, or a part of animation, platform, etc.

The question is if there is something similar to the spriteSheet, but for audio.

I have an audio that I can play at any time with:

public AudioClip miSonido;
void Start () {
    source = GetComponent<AudioSource>();
}

void Update () {

    if (Input.GetButtonDown("Fire1"))
    {
        source.Play(miSonido);
    }
}

}

What I would be interested in is being able to access a part of that sound, and play it in a loop. In such a way that later, at another point (for example, when colliding with a tree that I have in one part of the stage) another part of the sound begins to be reproduced. But this being the same source file.

come on, what if there is something like this:

source.Play(miSonido, startAt, endAt, bucle)

(I made this last up, it's more or less to indicate what I'm looking for)

I shouldn't have a problem figuring out the possible time startAt. endAt I can use Audacity or another sound editor to locate the moment of time.

I have a symfony2 application with a rest api and a sonataAdmin backend.

In the security.yml file I have the following:

security:
    encoders:
        FOS\UserBundle\Model\UserInterface: bcrypt

    role_hierarchy:
        ROLE_ADMIN:  [ROLE_USER, ROLE_SONATA_ADMIN]
        ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN: [ROLE_ADMIN, ROLE_ALLOWED_TO_SWITCH]
        SONATA:
            - ROLE_SONATA_PAGE_ADMIN_PAGE_EDIT

    providers:
        fos_userbundle:
            id: fos_user.user_manager

    firewalls:
        dev:
            pattern: ^/(_(profiler|wdt)|css|images|js)/
            security: false

        admin:
            pattern:  /admin(.*)
            context:  user
            form_login:
                provider: fos_userbundle
                login_path: /admin/login
                use_forward: false
                check_path: /admin/login_check
                failure_path: null
            logout:
                path:    /admin/logout
            anonymous: true

        oauth_token:
            pattern:    ^/oauth/v2/token$
            security:   false

        oauth_authorize:
            pattern:    ^/oauth/v2/auth$
            security:    false
            # Add your favorite authentication process here

        api:
            pattern:    ^/api(?!/user$)(?!/user/visit/)(?!/doc$) #con este patron todo api menos doc esta protegido
            fos_oauth:  true
            stateless:  true
            anonymous:  false # can be omitted as its default value

        main:
            pattern: .*
            context: user
            form_login:
                provider: fos_userbundle
                login_path: /login
                use_forward: false
                check_path: /login_check
                failure_path: null
            logout:  true
            anonymous: true

access_control:
    # url de fosuserbundle que debe ser disponible para usuarios anonimos
    - { path: ^/login$, role: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY }
    - { path: ^/register, role: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY }
    - { path: ^/resetting, role: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY }
    #url de admin login necesita ser accesible sin credenciales
    - { path: ^/admin/login$, role: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY }
    - { path: ^/admin/logout$, role: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY }
    - { path: ^/admin/login_check$, role: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY }

    - { path: ^/admin, role: [ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
    - { path: ^/.*, role: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY }
    - { path: ^/api/doc/.*, role: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY }

    # url de api. Debe estar validado siempre.
    - { path: ^/api, roles: [ IS_FULLY_AUTHENTICATED ] }

That is, among other routes, I have the following security configuration:

• routes /admin(.*)protected under the firewalladmin
• routes ^/api(?!/user$)(?!/user/visit/)(?!/doc$)(everything that hangs from /api, except /api/user, /api/user/visitand /api/docare protected under oauth2.

Now they have asked me that the documentation be /apiprotected but by the admin, so that if the user is not authenticated, they will be directed to /admin/login. If it is authenticated, the doc is shown.

I have changed the admin pattern to the following:

(admin(.*))|(\/api\/doc(.*))

and the api pattern looks like this:

^/api(?!/user$)(?!/user/visit/)

However, when accessing via browser to /api/doc, if I am not registered, the documentation appears. It looks like it doesn't launch security or there is something I'm not doing right.

Can anyone suggest me a solution?