What would be the Castilianization of the term build in programming? As far as I know, it's used when a compiler compiles something, but it's not the same thing, because when you work with an assembler and assemble something, it 's also called build . Maybe I'm not understanding the true meaning of this expression. How would it be translated? I don't think it's build .
The "build", either through the compilation of resources, or through the assembly, refers to collecting all the resources of the project and "mounting" (building) a single file, or at least the files essential for execution.
I think the most normal thing is to translate it as "compile", but "assemble" or "build" would also be correct. I think that the most used term today is "compile" because very few people program in assembler anymore.
In programming, the word build means " to build ", in the sense of precompile , compile , assemble , link , package code , etc. It is usually used when taking the source code and generating all the object, machine, interpretable, module, script, or whatever code that applies. in computer terms it is more accurate to compile it doesn't matter if you are using a high level language (like Python) or a low level language (like assembler) because you don't " assemble ", but compile the program
build
literally translates to "Build", but in programmingbuild
it is alsocompilar